<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Brislen &#8211; iStart keeping business informed on technology</title>
	<atom:link href="https://istart.com.au/istart-author/paul-brislen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://istart.com.au</link>
	<description>iStart keeping business informed on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>
	Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:02:46 +0000	</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be a twit: tweet</title>
		<link>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dont-be-a-twit-tweet/</link>
				<comments>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dont-be-a-twit-tweet/#respond</comments>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 20:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennene Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testbed.istart2.com.au/?post_type=opinion-article&#038;p=4594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p><b style="color: #727272;">Paul Brislen</b><span style="color: #727272;"> describes the moment Twitter started making sense and why he tries not to deal with companies that don’t tweet...</span></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dont-be-a-twit-tweet/">Don&#8217;t be a twit: tweet</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Twitter. As a former reporter, it’s the replacement news feed that I’d been looking for.</p>
<p>It wasn’t always that way, however. When I first heard of Twitter I wasn’t that fussed. Sounds like ICQ or any of the other instant messaging platforms, I thought. I’d used ICQ extensively in a distributed newsroom setting so we could all stay in touch and because we all used it for everything, even across-the-room chat, those who worked remotely were included in the conversation.</p>
<p>But yet another version of that? “Meh”, I thought. Of course, Twitter differs fundamentally from instant message platforms and it wasn’t until someone re-tweeted a photo of a bunch of people standing on the wing of a plane that was floating in the Hudson River in New York that I realised this was the news feed I’d been dreaming of.</p>
<p>Someone on a rescue boat had taken a photo and posted it straight to Twitter. It was at least half an hour before the New Zealand news websites started carrying ‘breaking news’ banners about a plane crashing in New York, but I knew they were all OK and I had proof.</p>
<p>It was a seminal moment, but Twitter doesn’t just allow me to see what other people are doing right this second – far from it. It’s also my new favourite search engine and the single best way to get in touch with a corporation.</p>
<p>I’ll give you an example – I went to Hong Kong for business about two years ago and when I got to the hotel I couldn’t find my credit card. “Great”, I thought. “I’ve left it in the chemist at the airport in Auckland. Brilliant.”</p>
<p>I called Kiwibank, but of course it was after hours so nobody could take my call. I wanted the card blocked until I figured out where it was, so I tweeted and Kiwibank came straight back – yes, they could help. They called me, we verified identities and the card was blocked.</p>
<p>I couldn’t have done that without Twitter and these days I try not to deal with companies that don’t have a Twitter account. All too often companies seem to put barriers in the way of doing business with them – Twitter cuts through all of the rigmarole in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>It’s also incredibly fast and closes the gap between customer and CEO from a few weeks to mere seconds. In the old days you’d get poor service, you’d demand to speak with a supervisor, you’d be fobbed off and ultimately you’d writea letter. In due course that would find its way to someone senior and you’d get a response, or not if they didn’t think it worth the bother.</p>
<p>These days that’s all gone. Responses have to be immediate and clearly thought out or they become the stuff of legend. Dominos Pizza, United Airlines, Comcast and WalMart have all been caught with their social media pants down in recent years, and closer to home we’ve seen local companies also try to bluff and bluster their way through what is, at its heart, an exercise in customer relationship management.</p>
<p>Social media puts consumers in the driver’s seat. No more interactive voice recognition, or hold music. No more fobbing off and form letters that go nowhere. Any company that ignores social media is ignoring its customers and that’s a business that I don’t want to have anything to do with.</p>
<p>Years ago I asked my dentist about flossing. I’m from the UK and we didn’t have such things when I was a kid. “Which teeth do I floss?” I asked. “Only the ones you want to keep,” he said. Social media is like that. Which customers should you talk to? Only the ones you want to keep.</p>
<p><strong>ABOUT PAUL BRISLEN//<a href="https://istart.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/writer_paul_brislen.gif"><img class="alignright wp-image-4336 size-full" src="https://istart.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/writer_paul_brislen.gif" alt="Paul Brislen" width="150" height="159" /></a></strong></p>
<p><a style="color: #ff9900;" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-brislen/17/767/180">Paul Brislen</a> was the Telecommunication Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ) chief executive. He left the post in May 2014. Craig Young will be his replacement.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dont-be-a-twit-tweet/">Don&#8217;t be a twit: tweet</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/dont-be-a-twit-tweet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fibre acceleration</title>
		<link>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration/</link>
				<comments>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration/#respond</comments>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennene Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testbed.istart2.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration-2/</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Paul Brislen</strong> talks about why we can never have enough bandwidth and that’s not a bad thing...</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration/">The fibre acceleration</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of people on the internet who seem to think the idea of building a fibre network to three quarters of the country’s buildings is a bad idea. I can only assume they don’t use the internet today and if they do, they certainly didn’t use it when we were all on dial-up.</p>
<p>I’m reminded in many ways of the early days of ADSL broadband. Back in 1999 there were plenty of nay-sayers who couldn’t understand why having ‘always on’ access to the internet was a good thing. They couldn’t see the value in having a faster internet connection because their dial-up connection was good enough.</p>
<p>And in many respects it was. I worked from home on a dial up connection and then on an early ADSL1 service from Telecom that gave me 600MB of data to use every month. I managed to cope with that because in 1999 the amount of video content was limited, my applications (such as they were) tended towards the minimalist because the bandwidth constraints were so great, and nobody really used the internet for anything more than email and bulletin boards.</p>
<p>But I knew then that I wanted more and that if I had more I could do more.<span style="color: #727272;"> </span><a style="color: #ff9905;" href="http://tuanz.org.nz/">TUANZ</a><span style="color: #727272;"> </span>put together a three-day session to discuss what opportunities lay on the other side of ubiquitous, cheap access to very fast internet speeds and we wrote a book <em>(‘Survival of the Fastest’)</em> all about what was, back then, science fiction.</p>
<p>Wouldn’t it be good if I could connect with all my friends as they were travelling around the place so I would know who was nearby so I could have a coffee with them? Wouldn’t it be good if I could put on a pair of goggles and see the Coliseum in Rome as it was 2000 years ago? Wouldn’t it be great if I could video-conference not only from the giant telepresence suite at work but also from my home PC?</p>
<p>We dreamt up the likes of Facebook, 4Square, Google Goggles and Skype but without any real thought to make them into real products (aside from Mark Billinghurst who now runs augmented reality company<span style="color: #727272;"> </span><a style="color: #ff9905;" href="http://www.hitlabnz.org/">HitLab</a><span style="color: #727272;">) </span>but we knew that if we had access to good connectivity, these things would be possible.<br style="color: #727272;" /><br style="color: #727272;" />A fibre network that connects most of us is the start of the future for New Zealand. It will change the way we communicate with each other. It will enhance our business opportunities. It will improve our health system, give us access to better education, redefine the way we as citizens interact with our government at all levels and hopefully a whole raft of things we haven’t thought of yet because we’re stuck in our 2Mbit/s world.</p>
<p>I could use a 10Mbit/s symmetrical connection today. I’d jump at the chance to get a better upload speed because suddenly I need it. Tomorrow I’ll be looking for 50Mbit/s and the day after 100Mbit/s. My home connection is no longer just something that I use – now my kids use it, my wife uses it, all our devices are constantly going out seeking updates and, if Google gets its way, my house will shortly be connecting to the world, not to mention my car.</p>
<p>In the next decade we’ll see 4K television become more accessible, we’ll see home automation take off, we’ll see the ‘internet of things’ become a reality and for all of that to happen we need fibre.</p>
<p>The problem as I see it is not that “nobody really wants this stuff” as some would have you believe, but rather that not everyone will have access to it. This isn’t a problem of the government demanding industry build a white elephant – it’s a problem of haves and have-nots.</p>
<p>I’d like to see technology become a key issue in the upcoming election. I want New Zealand to do better, to have more and to foot it with the best of them. It’s high time we had a government that saw the opportunity rather than the cost of all this.</p>
<p><strong>ABOUT PAUL BRISLEN//</strong></p>
<p><a style="color: #ff9905;" href="https://www.linkedin.com/pub/paul-brislen/17/767/180">Paul Brislen</a><span style="color: #727272;"> </span>is the Telecommunication Users Association of New Zealand (TUANZ) chief executive.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration/">The fibre acceleration</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://istart.com.au/opinion-article/the-fibre-acceleration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security legislation: living in strange times</title>
		<link>https://istart.com.au/news-items/security-legislation-living-in-strange-times/</link>
				<comments>https://istart.com.au/news-items/security-legislation-living-in-strange-times/#respond</comments>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayden McCall]]></dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testbed.istart2.com.au/?post_type=news-items&#038;p=594</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul Brislen takes a look at the two pieces of legislation currently making their way with, what he believes, “undue haste” through New Zealand’s parliament.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/news-items/security-legislation-living-in-strange-times/">Security legislation: living in strange times</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="vc_section_wrapper"><div class="wpb_row row-fluid">
	<div class="span12 wpb_column column_container">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element ">
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<p>There are two pieces of legislation that currently concern me. The first is the Government Communications and Security Bureau Bill, which is designed to tidy up some pesky confusion about just what the GCSB is allowed to do.</p>
<p>According to the government, the current Act is outdated and open to misinterpretation. Apparently, the New Zealand government has been allowing the NZ SIS and police to use the GCSB personnel and capability to fill in gaps in their own capabilities. That is, the SIS or police get a warrant to spy on a New Zealand citizen or resident and the GCSB does the leg work.</p>
<p>The only problem with this (well, not the only problem, but the one we’ll focus on) is the current GCSB Act prohibits the GCSB from doing this. But the Government says it’s not clear and the new legislation will tidy it up for all to see.</p>
<p>The current Act says:</p>
<p>Neither the Director, nor an employee of the Bureau, nor a person acting on behalf of the Bureau may authorise or take any action for the purpose of intercepting the communications of a person (not being a foreign organisation or a foreign person) who is a New Zealand citizen or a permanent resident.</p>
<p>Frankly, to my mind, this seems quite clear-cut and unambiguous. The GCSB cannot spy on New Zealand citizens or permanent residents at all. Ever. Under any circumstances.</p>
<p>The Prime Minister says the new GCSB Bill won’t extend the powers of the GCSB but will allow the GCSB to spy on New Zealanders or permanent residents. Sounds like an extension to me.</p>
<p>On top of that, the government has introduced a new Telecommunications Interception (Capability and Security) Bill which will “tidy up” the existing Telecommunications Interception Act which is also, apparently, somewhat loosely worded.</p>
<p>The current Act requires telcos to work with agencies that have warrants and to ensure that communications are able to be intercepted.</p>
<p>The new TICS Bill goes beyond that. Not only will telcos be required to make sure their networks can be intercepted, but over-the-top providers (such as Google, Microsoft and Apple) may also be required to do likewise. In addition, if these providers come up with a product that can’t be intercepted, the GCSB may require that product not be sold in New Zealand.</p>
<p>So, if Apple comes up with a messaging solution, let’s call it iMessage because that’s its name, which is encrypted and which allows secure communication that can’t be intercepted, then either Apple has to hack its own systems on behalf of the New Zealand spy agency or not sell the product in New Zealand. Which is likely to happen do you think, given that the equivalent US law explicitly tells US telco service providers that they’re not allowed to do this kind of thing for any other country? They can spy for America, but not for New Zealand.</p>
<p>And let’s imagine that a New Zealand company comes up with a new cloud-based service that revolutionises business communications. Given the extreme nature of the New Zealand legislation, would any non-New Zealander ever trust that company’s assurances regarding security and privacy? Probably not.</p>
<p>The TICS bill doesn’t stop there. It goes one step further and introduces a whole new section which gives the GCSB the power to oversee certain elements of the telcos’ networks. Companies like Chorus, Vodafone and Telecom won’t be allowed to make changes to certain key elements without getting permission from the GCSB. Presumably that will include not only the hardware and software that will be deployed (or removed) but also which provider the telcos are allowed to use. Given that the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) prepared by ministry officials includes lots of redacted paragraphs, it’s a little hard to tell just what advice was given, but there are numerous references to Huawei and ZTE, two well-known Chinese equipment providers.</p>
<p>The upshot is that the government is increasing the GCSB’s capability but outsourcing the cost of that increase to the telcos themselves. Huawei has made a name for itself by offering good quality equipment at a significant cost saving for the telcos – if they can’t use Huawei in future because of some perceived security issue then the telcos costs will increase, even before we get into the realm of having to store (and make accessible) customer data.</p>
<p>This is the crux of the issue. We have a security apparatus that is built around an alliance with our traditional comrades in arms – the US, UK, Australia and Canada. But at the same time we have a trade model built around the new world order of South East Asia and China in particular. The two worlds don’t exist well together and unfortunately we’re eventually going to have to choose one over the other. In the meantime, New Zealanders will be spied on by an agency with a new remit that includes not only security issues but also economic factors, and we will end up paying more for the privilege.</p>
<p>These are indeed strange times we live in.</p>

		</div> 
	</div> 
		</div> 
	</div> 
</div></section>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au/news-items/security-legislation-living-in-strange-times/">Security legislation: living in strange times</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://istart.com.au">iStart keeping business informed on technology</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://istart.com.au/news-items/security-legislation-living-in-strange-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
							</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
